The body of the lens has a smooth matt metal finish, with a knurled rubber focus ring at the front end of the lens. It is certainly good enough for photographing live insects. To get a 1:1 magnification, the lens needs to be at its minimum focus distance of 28cm, which gives a good working distance between the subject and the end of the lens. Internally, the lens is constructed of 15 elements in 11 groups, with nine rounded aperture blades. Personally, I don’t see the 79 x 130.5mm dimensions, or 602g weight, being an issue, and I had no problem handling or carrying the camera around with me for a whole day. Once again, Sony has produced what many will think is a fairly large lens for the Alpha 7 cameras. Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS review – Build and handling Overall, the OSS (Optical Steady Shot) built in to the lens works well, adding a touch of reassurance when shooting handheld street or landscape images, and it can also help with macro shots. The shallow depth of field means that just a slight shift back or forth can change the focus plane. At very close distances the problem is the back-and-forth movement that stabilisation can’t correct. I even managed to shoot some macro images at this speed, although more through luck, careful technique and firing a short burst than through the image stabilisation itself. Optical image stabilisation is featured in the lens, allowing me to shoot as slow as 1/15sec when taking images of distant objects. However, Alpha 7 users primarily in need of a specialist portrait lens would likely be better served by the Sony FE 85mm F1.8. Combined with the 90mm focal length, this means that the optic could double up as a portrait lens. Sony’s lens has an f/2.8 maximum aperture, with a minimum setting of f/22. In this context, the Sony 90mm Macro lens follows in the footsteps of the highly regarded Tamron 90mm, Tokina 100mm and Sigma 105mm macro lenses – quite an illustrious group to be part of. It offers a good working distance between the subject and the end of the lens, and has a narrow enough field of view so that backgrounds can be fairly concentrated and blown nicely out of focus. The 90-105mm focal length is a sweet spot for macro photographers. Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS review – Features But does it deliver the goods? Find out how it performs in our in-depth Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS review.įor more options, check out our guides to the Best Sony cameras, Best Sony lenses and Best macro lenses. With the lens’ price tag now at $1,098 / £800, it has perhaps come down into more photographers’ budgets since its launch. The 90mm mark has often been a favourite focal length for macro photography, as it provides enough distance from your subject to shoot it comfortably and render it lifesize in the frame. ![]() Those using Sony’s APS-C cameras have the option of the E 30mm F1.8 ($298 / £185), which weighs just 138g and provides 1:1 magnification. Since then, Sony has also introduced the more affordable FE 50mm F2.8 Macro ($549 / £449), while Sigma now provides strong competition with its excellent 105mm F2.8 DG DN Art ($799 / £649). When Sony released the FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS lens, it opened up a world of possibilities to E-mount shooters, providing them with a premium optic for capturing life-size images of smaller subjects. Until then, anyone interested in macro photography needed Sony’s own LA-EA adapters for Alpha-mount lenses or third-party adapters to shoot macro images. I went after several used ones on eBay before I got one and only saved about $200 compared to new.When the Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS came along in 2015, it was the first true macro lens for full-frame Sony E-mount cameras. Its an expensive lens and is much sought after. Manual focus is very easy and very good with the switch on the lens. The lens does hunt a bit for focus depending on which setting you have it on. I would expect that the Canon Macro plus adaptor would be even heavier. I am hoping to find something that will fit in the $20-$50 range. Novoflex makes one for e-mount but its over $100. I am looking for a suitable tripod mount collar. ![]() That may not be as much of an issue with your A6300 which I think is a bit sturdier than my A6000. The 90mm is fine for hand held, but I am concerned that the lens puts too much pressure on the camera body when mounted on a tripod. ![]() It is a bit bigger and heavier than the 18-105mm F4 G lens which is my main lens. The lens looks and feels very high quality but is pretty heavy even for an FE. I have taken a few macro shots and was very pleased with the results but I haven't really tested it yet. ![]() I got the 90mm macro for my A6000 recently. Has anyone used the Sony a6300 with the Sony FE 90mm f/2.8 Macro G OSS Lens? If you have used other macro lenses how does the 90mm compare to for example the Canon 100mm macro?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |